U&PU is a blawg,
which lawyer/blogger Denise Howell (Bag and Baggage) defined as
"a web log written by lawyers and/or concerned primarily with legal affairs."

Topics shall also include
- linguistics (often as it relates to law)
- politics and current events
- philosophy and jurisprudence, and naturally
Stuff Worth Reading, which includes books, articles, posts, caselaw, and more.

Read, share, and enjoy. Some rights reserved.

Unused and Probably Unusable

-- a linguistically inclined blawg

Posts pending: Heinlein Friday and Superman
Contrary to my usual practice, this week's Heinlein Friday will issue later than usual, perhaps by 8 p.m. today.

This week, I plan to reveal the perhaps non-obvious connections between the new movie Superman Returns (it's great, by the way) and Heinlein's work. Heinlein worked on, or wrote the source material for, three movies: Destination Moon, Starship Troopers (and its sequels and spinoffs, I suppose), and Robert A. Heinlein's The Puppet Masters (long name used to distinguish it from a prior, unrelated movie). His books themselves, though, provide a more apt and more interesting comparison for the distinct and distinctive form of media - and sensation - that is the new Superman.

Also, check out this cutting and skeptical article at CSICOP, titled Critical Thinking: What Is It Good for? (In Fact, What is It?), by Howard Gabennesch [sic - the For was not capitalized in the original, it appears, despite the capitalization of Is and It. Highly irregular]. The article appears also in the March/April 2006 issue of Skeptical Inquirer.

To summarize: "critical thinking" does not mean "critiques of generally accepted institutions and norms. "Critical" means hard-headed, rational, and logical, not ideologically biased in a different direction. It is not "critical" (in the sense of critical thinking) to say that the cosmetics industry is a monstrous money-making machine which "perpetuates the myth" that older women are less attractive. It is critical, surely. It is not unbiased. It is also not necessarily an honest formulation. As HG suggests, a more critical approach might recognize that the cosmetics industry is a monstrous money-making machine which is both a cause and an effect of society's reflection of the fact that there is differential attractiveness of adult women with respect to age, due in part to biological differences, such as fertility and related reproductive (and thus evolutionary) advantages.

Also, as always, check out my Jots page for some of the best recent (and not so recent) links I've found, neatly cross-categorized for your reading convenience. And finally, check out the outstanding coverage of the wonderful result in Hamdan at SCOTUSblog. There are literally a dozen or more interesting end-of-term posts, particularly this one by Marty Lederman.

More to come!

Eh N.
Posted by Eh Nonymous on Friday June 30, 2006 at 9:24am
Eh Nonymous (mail) (www):
And now I notice that Jots seems to be down lately. I hope it comes back up soon.
6.30.2006 5:06pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?
All* comments welcome. Guests must supply a name, but it can be "A Nother Nonymous Commenter" or even just a single letter. Witty names are appreciated. Obscene names, and their accompanying comments, will be deleted.

*Not all comments welcome. Flippant, facetious, fierce, or fatuous, fine. Fraudulent, felonious, fabricated, facially insufficient, and farkin' futile, fuggeddaboutit.